Shoalhaven’s Restructure: Efficiency or Hatchet Job?

Why This Matters to You

Shoalhaven City Council has released a formal notification of another major restructure – and on paper it looks like a routine exercise in “efficiency.” But scratch the surface and you find a story of job cuts, centralisation, and political manoeuvring that should worry every ratepayer.

What Council Says

The official line is wrapped in corporate language: “Centralisation, Simplification, Sustainability.”

• 55 jobs will go – 31 already vacant, but 24 currently occupied.

• 14.6 new roles will be created to support “core functions.”

• Reporting lines across multiple directorates will be redrawn.

• The aim? To save $3.5 million in staff costs this financial year.

The proposal invokes Clause 42 of the Local Government (State) Award, which requires a 28-day consultation period with staff and unions. Formal feedback runs until 10 October 2025.

What This Means in Practice

For staff, it’s brutal. Twenty-four permanent employees will be displaced. Letters have gone out to each affected worker, and the unions have been notified. Council has even included a link to counselling services in the announcement – a clear signal of the personal toll.

For the organisation, it means more concentration of decision-making at the top, fewer senior and specialist roles, and heavier reliance on centralised management.

For the community, it raises a simple question: if roles in planning, cultural services, libraries, environmental services, and customer experience are axed, who actually delivers the services residents rely on?

The Political Subtext

Big structural change just before a new CEO appointment is a classic play: remove critics, reshape the organisation, and hand over a leaner, more compliant structure.

The Law and the Limits

Under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), staffing is the CEO’s responsibility, not councillors’. Councillors set the strategic direction, but they cannot legally micro-manage who stays and who goes.

That’s the theory. In practice, councillors often exert pressure behind closed doors. When restructures appear politically motivated rather than genuinely operational, they attract the attention of oversight bodies like the NSW Ombudsman, the OLG, and ICAC.

The question is whether this “consultation” is genuine, or just a tick-box exercise to rubber-stamp decisions already made.

Why This Matters to You

This isn’t just an internal HR issue. It affects:

• Service delivery: Fewer hands means slower approvals, fewer programs, and less community support.

• Transparency: Consolidating power makes it harder for the public to know who is accountable.

• Trust: Every time Council couches political moves in corporate buzzwords, residents’ trust erodes further.

Final Word

Shoalhaven Council frames this restructure as business as usual. But behind the spreadsheets and organisational charts, it looks and feels like a pre-emptive strike: clear the decks, cut costs, centralise control, and hand the keys to whoever comes in next.

This is not just about jobs. It’s about the culture of Council, the services we all rely on, and whether decisions are being made for the community – or for politics.

---

👉 Your Turn: Do you think this restructure is about efficiency, or is it a political hatchet job?

---

• Please share this with 2 friends who care about Shoalhaven.

If you get value from this post and you want to help me with information applications to get to the bottom of issues, you can donate here.

Thank you for considering this, the posts will always be free - but I could do with some help :)

Here are the current applications to council, seeking documents. At the moment I have one matter before NCAT. I will fight for transparency.

Disclaimer: This article provides analysis and commentary based on publicly available information and council transcripts. It does not make allegations of misconduct by any individual. Readers should verify details independently before drawing conclusions.

Here is a quick disclaimer, or explainer on the use of AI in the Eye.